Summary
The following indicators are better in East Riding of Yorkshire than in England:
- Shigella incidence rate/100,000 (2017)
- Giardia incidence rate/100,000 (2017)
- Measles 5-year incidence rate/100,000 (2019 - 23)
- Mumps 5-year incidence rate/100,000 (2019 - 23)
- Children in care immunisations (2023)
- Population vaccination coverage: Rotavirus (Rota) (1 year) (2023/24)
- Population vaccination coverage: Dtap IPV Hib HepB (1 year old) (2023/24)
- Population vaccination coverage: Hib and MenC booster (2 years old) (2023/24)
- Population vaccination coverage: MMR for one dose (2 years old) (2023/24)
- Population vaccination coverage: Dtap IPV Hib HepB (2 years old) (2023/24)
- Population vaccination coverage: PCV booster (2023/24)
- Population vaccination coverage - Hib / Men C booster (5 years old) (2017/18)
- Population vaccination coverage: MMR for one dose (5 years old) (2023/24)
- Population vaccination coverage: MMR for two doses (5 years old) (2023/24)
- Population vaccination coverage: Flu (primary school aged children) (2023)
- Population vaccination coverage: Flu (at risk individuals) (2023/24)
- Population vaccination coverage: Flu (aged 65 and over) (2023/24)
- Population vaccination coverage: Meningococcal ACWY conjugate vaccine (MenACWY) (14 to 15 years) (2023/24)
- TB incidence (three year average) (2020 - 22)
- New STI diagnoses (excluding chlamydia aged under 25) per 100,000 (2023)
- Chlamydia diagnostic rate per 100,000 aged 25 years and older (2023)
- Gonorrhoea diagnostic rate per 100,000 (2023)
- Syphilis diagnostic rate per 100,000 (2023)
- Genital warts diagnostic rate per 100,000 (2023)
- Genital herpes diagnosis rate per 100,000 (2023)
- New HIV diagnosis rate per 100,000 (2023)
- New HIV diagnoses among persons first diagnosed in the UK rate per 100,000 (2023)
- HIV diagnosed prevalence rate per 1,000 aged 15 to 59 (2023)
- Population vaccination coverage: HPV vaccination coverage for two doses (13 to 14 years old)(Male) (2022/23)
- Population vaccination coverage: HPV vaccination coverage for two doses (13 to 14 years old)(Female) (2022/23)
The following indicators are worse in East Riding of Yorkshire than in England:
- Campylobacter incidence rate/100,000 (2017)
- Population vaccination coverage: PPV (2022/23)
- Persons in drug misuse treatment who inject drugs - Percentage of eligible persons who have received a hepatitis C test (2017/18)
- Chlamydia proportion of females aged 15 to 24 screened (2023)
- STI testing rate (exclude chlamydia aged under 25) per 100,000 (2023)
- Adjusted antibiotic prescribing in primary care by the NHS (2023)
The following indicators are lower in East Riding of Yorkshire than in England:
- Hepatitis C detection rate/100,000 (2021)
- All new STI diagnoses rate per 100,000 (2023)
- Chlamydia diagnostic rate per 100,000 (2023)
- Mycoplasma genitalium diagnostic rate per 100,000 (2023)
- Trichomoniasis diagnostic rate per 100,000 (2023)
- STI testing positivity (excluding chlamydia aged under 25) (2023)
Figure 1. Chart showing key health protection information for East Riding of Yorkshire local authority residents compared to the rest of England
The local result for each indicator is shown as a circle, against the range of results for England shown as a grey bar. The line at the centre of the chart shows the England average, the diamond shows the average for the Yorkshire and the Humber region (statistical).
Compared to England:
-
Better
-
Similar
-
Worse
- or
-
Lower
-
Similar
-
Higher
- or
-
Not compared
Key for spine bars
Figure 2. Population vaccine coverage in East Riding of Yorkshire compared to Yorkshire and the Humber region (statistical) and England
Figure 3. Rates of selected indicators over time in East Riding of Yorkshire compared to Yorkshire and the Humber region (statistical) and England
Introduction
This report presents information on a range of health protection issues in a local area in an integrated way. This is produced alongside other UKHSA health intelligence tools to help local stakeholders identify health protection priorities.
This report is compiled from publically available data on the online Health Protection Profiles. Please access this tool for further data analysis and more information about the data which is described in the ‘definitions’ tab for each indicator. A list of data sources is available in the ‘Data sources’ section of this report.
It is important to understand the limitations of the data presented when interpreting a local authority indicator being higher/lower or better/worse than England. The caveats to each indicator are explained in the ‘definitions’ tab for each indicator on the online Health Protection Profiles. Interpretation of local variation will need consideration of a range of factors which may include:
variation in testing
variation in reporting
variation in the completeness of residence information. Cases may be assigned incorrectly to a local authority if postcode information is missing. In these circumstances the GP or laboratory postcode may be used instead
local outbreaks
The information in this report may differ from that originating from different data sources which are defined, collected, analysed in different ways. For example, information presented here may differ from that used locally which is sourced from CIMS, a UKHSA public health management system used by local Health Protection Teams.
City of London and Isles of Scilly are not included in the rankings in this document. Where comparisons are made to Hackney or Cornwall, please note that the data for these areas may have been combined with City of London and Isles of Scilly respectively. Please check the online Health Protection Profiles for this information.
This report has been developed for the best viewing experience in Google Chrome. It has also been tested with Microsoft Edge, but some content may look different. When viewed in Google Chrome, this report can be converted to a PDF through the Print menu. Select “Save as PDF” as the destination. For the best result, it is recommended to select the “background graphics” option and deselect the “headers and footers” option. Some other browsers also offer PDF conversion, but the formatting may not display as intended.