logo

1. Main messages

The main messages are:

  • obesity prevalence fell between 2020 to 2021 and 2021 to 2022 in girls and boys in both reception (aged 4 to 5 years old) and year 6 (aged 10 to 11 years old), but remained higher than pre-pandemic levels (2019 to 2020)
  • obesity prevalence in reception children returned much closer to pre-pandemic levels than for children in year 6
  • the change in obesity prevalence by ethnic group is complex, with no clear patterns and no ethnic group shows consistent change across age and sex groups
  • obesity prevalence in boys and girls in many ethnic groups, in both school years, remained higher than pre-pandemic levels, though Chinese boys in year 6 had lower obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 than the previous two years
  • obesity prevalence in reception girls living in the three most deprived deciles (deciles 1,2 and 3) and reception boys living in the second most deprived decile (decile 2) remained higher than pre-pandemic levels whereas prevalence in all other deciles dropped below pre-pandemic levels
  • obesity prevalence in reception girls and boys living in the East Midlands and London, boys living in Yorkshire and The Humber, girls and boys living in urban areas, and boys living in village areas remained higher than pre-pandemic levels
  • for girls and boys in year 6 living in every region, each deprivation decile and all types of rural and urban areas, obesity prevalence remained higher than pre-pandemic levels

2. Introduction

This report examines the changes in the prevalence of obesity and severe obesity between academic years 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022 using data from the National Child Measurement Programme (NCMP). Data collected between September 2021 and July 2022 (2021 to 2022 NCMP) is compared to the two previous years of NCMP data: data collected between September 2019 and March 2020 before the start of the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic (2019 to 2020 NCMP), and data collected one year later between March 2021 and July 2021 (2020 to 2021 NCMP). More detail about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on NCMP data can be found in section “11.1 Impact of COVID-19 on data”.

2.1 Body mass index (BMI) classification definitions for population monitoring

Assessing the BMI of children is more complicated than for adults as children are still growing. Growth patterns differ between boys and girls, so both the age and sex of a child needs to be considered when estimating whether BMI is too high or too low.

For population monitoring purposes in England, the British 1990 growth reference (UK90) for BMI is recommended for use to determine weight status according to a child’s age and sex. Each child’s BMI is calculated and compared with the BMI distribution for children of their age and sex from the UK90 growth reference. The population monitoring cut points for overweight and obesity (85th and 95th centiles respectively) are lower than the clinical cut points (91st and 98th centiles respectively) used to assess individual children. This is designed to also capture those children in the population who are at high risk of moving into the clinical overweight or clinical obesity categories. This helps ensure that adequate services are planned and delivered for the whole population. Within this report BMI is classified according to the following list using the UK90 growth reference:

  • obesity: greater than or equal to 95th centile
  • severe obesity: greater than or equal to 99.6th centile

2.2 About the NCMP

The NCMP is an annual programme that in a normal year measures the height and weight of over 1 million children in reception (aged 4 to 5 years) and year 6 (aged 10 to 11 years) in mainstream state-funded schools in England. Although the NCMP only covers two age groups, it normally includes most children in those school year groups. In 2021 to 2022 around 1,170,000 children were measured; 92% of all children eligible to be measured. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic meant that in 2020 to 2021, around 300,000 children (25% of previous full measurement years) were measured and in 2019 to 2020 around 890,000 children were measured (around 75% of previous years).

This report builds on last year’s changes in the prevalence of child obesity report to identify which population groups in England experienced returns to pre-pandemic prevalence of obesity and investigates whether existing disparities in child obesity have improved or worsened.

4. Interpreting change charts presented throughout this report

This report uses interactive charts to display the prevalence figures for 3 years of data. An example to help interpretation is shown in Figure 2; the dark blue bar on the chart is the prevalence of obesity or severe obesity for 2021 to 2022 (the latest year of data), the green horizontal line is the prevalence data for 2020 to 2021, and the orange circle shows the prevalence data for 2019 to 2020 (pre-pandemic). The higher the top of the blue bar, green line or orange circle the higher the prevalence value.

Use the computer mouse to hover over the bars and data points in the charts in this report to show an information box that will provide prevalence values, confidence intervals, and whether the differences between the data years are statistically significantly different (see section 11.4 of this report for how significant differences are calculated). To download an image of the chart, click on the small icon of a camera to the top right of the chart (this is visible only when hovering over the data chart).

Figure 2: Example of prevalence change chart

Throughout the report where an increase or decrease in prevalence is mentioned (described as higher or lower), it is statistically significant. The spreadsheet published alongside this report also has a column to indicate which changes are statistically significant compared to 2021 to 2022 data.

5. Changes in the prevalence of obesity and severe obesity by age and sex

Figures 3a and 3b show the change in obesity and severe obesity prevalence by age group and sex. Important findings to note are:

  • prevalence of obesity among girls and boys in reception in 2021 to 2022 returned to levels close to, though still higher than, pre-pandemic rates from 2019 to 2020 (figure 3a)
  • prevalence of obesity in girls and boys in year 6 in 2021 to 2022 remains much higher than pre-pandemic rates from 2019 to 2020 (figure 3b)
  • There was a similar pattern for severe obesity (figure 3a and 3b)

Obesity prevalence

Figure 3a: Obesity prevalence by age and sex between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022

Source: National Child Measurement Programme.

Severe obesity prevalence

Figure 3b: Severe obesity prevalence by age and sex between 2019 to 2020 and 2020 to 2021

Source: National Child Measurement Programme.

6. Changes in the prevalence of obesity and severe obesity by age, sex, and ethnic group

There are known disparities in weight status by ethnicity, with children from black and some Asian ethnic groups having higher prevalence of obesity than children of white British ethnicity. Some of the differences in prevalence between ethnic groups could be due to confounding factors such as area level deprivation. The commentary is restricted to children where ethnicity was known which represents 86% of children in reception and 89% of children in year 6.

6.1 Obesity prevalence

For obesity prevalence (Figure 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d):

  • in reception, girls and boys in nearly all ethnic groups had lower obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 (figure 4a and 4b)
  • in reception in 2021 to 2022, obesity prevalence remained higher than pre-pandemic levels (2019 to 2020) for black African girls, girls from any other Asian background, and any other ethnic group, and Pakistani boys, white and Asian boys, and boys from other black backgrounds (figure 4a and 4b)
  • in year 6, Indian girls, Pakistani girls, white and black Caribbean girls, white British girls, white Irish girls, Chinese girls, girls from any other Asian background and girls from any other black background had lower obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 (figure 4c)
  • in year 6, Indian boys, Pakistani boys, Chinese boys, boys from any other Asian background, black African boys, boys from any other Asian background, any other black background, mixed white and black Caribbean background and any other ethnic groups, white British boys and boys from any other white background have lower obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 (figure 4d)
  • in year 6 in 2021 to 2022, obesity prevalence remained higher than pre-pandemic levels for Indian girls, Pakistani girls, black African girls, white British girls, and girls from any other black background, any other mixed background, any other white background, and any other ethnic group (figure 4c)
  • in year 6, Chinese boys had lower obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2019 to 2020, most of the other ethnic groups had higher obesity prevalence than before the pandemic (figure 4d)

Girls aged 4 to 5

Figure 4a: Obesity prevalence by ethnic group between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, girls in reception (aged 4-5 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Boys aged 4 to 5

Figure 4b: Obesity prevalence by ethnic group between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, boys in reception (aged 4-5 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Girls aged 10 to 11

Figure 4c: Obesity prevalence by ethnic group between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, girls in year 6 (aged 10-11 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Boys aged 10 to 11

Figure 4d: Obesity prevalence by ethnic group between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, boys in year 6 (aged 10-11 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

6.2 Severe obesity prevalence

For severe obesity prevalence (Figure 4e, 4f, 4g, 4h):

  • in reception, girls and boys in nearly all ethnic groups had lower severe obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 (figure 4e and 4f)
  • in reception in 2021 to 2022, severe obesity prevalence remained higher than pre-pandemic levels (2019 to 2020) for black African girls, white British girls, Bangladeshi boys, Indian boys, Pakistani boys, white British boys and boys from any other ethnic group (figure 4e and 4f)
  • in year 6, only Indian girls, Pakistani girls, girls from any other Asian background and white and black Caribbean girls had lower severe obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 (figure 4g)
  • in year 6, black African boys, boys from any other black background and any other ethnic group and white British boys had lower severe obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 (figure 4h)
  • in year 6, Bangladeshi girls, Pakistani girls, black African girls, black Caribbean girls, white British girls and girls from any other Asian background, any other ethnic group, and any other white background, had a higher prevalence of severe obesity in 2021 to 2022 compared to pre-pandemic rates from 2019 to 2020 (figure 4g)
  • in year 6, severe obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 remained higher than pre-pandemic rates of 2019 to 2020 in Pakistani boys, black African boys, black Caribbean boys, white British boys, boys from any other Asian background, white and Asian boys, white and black Caribbean boys, boys from any other black background, any other white background and any other ethnic group (figure 4h)

Girls aged 4 to 5

Figure 4e: Severe obesity prevalence by ethnic group between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, girls in reception (aged 4-5 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Boys aged 4 to 5

Figure 4f: Severe obesity prevalence by ethnic group between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, boys in reception (aged 4-5 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Girls aged 10 to 11

Figure 4g: Severe obesity prevalence by ethnic group between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, girls in year 6 (aged 10-11 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Boys aged 10 to 11

Figure 4h: Severe obesity prevalence by ethnic group between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, boys in year 6 (aged 10-11 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

7. Changes in the prevalence of obesity and severe obesity by age, sex, and deprivation

There is a strong correlation between weight status and deprivation, with children living in the more deprived areas experiencing a higher prevalence of obesity. Data is presented using the 2019 Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), a measure of relative deprivation for small areas. The small areas are divided according to their deprivation rank into 10 equal groups (deciles), ranging from the most deprived (decile 1) to the least deprived (decile 10).

7.1 Obesity prevalence

For obesity prevalence (Figure 5a, 5b,5c,5d):

  • in reception, girls and boys across all deciles had significantly lower obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 (figure 5a and 5b)
  • in reception, obesity prevalence remained higher than pre-pandemic rates of 2019 to 2020 for girls living in the three most deprived deciles (deciles 1, 2 and 3), and boys living in the second most deprived decile (decile 2 (figure 5a and 5b)
  • in year 6, girls living in deciles 1 to 7 and boys living in deciles 1 to 9 had lower obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 (figure 5c and 5d)
  • in year 6, obesity prevalence remained higher than pre-pandemic rates of 2019 to 2020 for girls and boys living in every decile (figure 5c and 5d)

Girls aged 4 to 5

Figure 5a: Obesity prevalence by deprivation decile between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, girls in reception (aged 4-5 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme, NHS England.

Boys aged 4 to 5

Figure 5b: Obesity prevalence by deprivation decile between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, boys in reception (aged 4-5 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme, NHS England.

Girls aged 10 to 11

Figure 5c: Obesity prevalence by deprivation decile between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, girls in year 6 (aged 10-11 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme, NHS England.

Boys aged 10 to 11

Figure 5d: Obesity prevalence by deprivation decile between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, boys in year 6 (aged 10-11 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme, NHS England.

7.2 Severe obesity prevalence

For severe obesity prevalence (Figure 5e, 5f, 5g, 5h):

  • in reception, girls and boys across all deciles except girls living in the second least deprived decile (decile 9) had lower severe obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 with prevalence returning close to the pre-pandemic rates of 2019 to 2020 but still with some statistically significant difference for some subgroups (figure 5e and 5f)
  • in reception, severe obesity prevalence remained higher than pre-pandemic rates of 2019 to 2020 for girls living in deciles 1, 2, 3, 6 and 8 and boys living deciles 1, 2, 3, 7, 9 and 10 (figure 5e and 5f)
  • in year 6, girls living in deciles 1, 3 and 5 and boys living in deciles 1, 2, 3, 7, and 8 had lower severe obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 and boys living in decile 10 had higher severe obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 (figure 5g and 5h)
  • in year 6, severe obesity prevalence remained higher than pre-pandemic rates of 2019 to 2020 for girls and boys living in each decile (figure 5g and 5h)

Girls aged 4 to 5

Figure 5e: Severe obesity prevalence by deprivation decile between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, girls in reception (aged 4-5 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Boys aged 4 to 5

Figure 5f: Severe obesity prevalence by deprivation decile between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, boys in reception (aged 4-5 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Girls aged 10 to 11

Figure 5g: Severe obesity prevalence by deprivation decile between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, girls in year 6 (aged 10-11 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Boys aged 10 to 11

Figure 5h: Severe obesity prevalence by deprivation decile between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, boys in year 6 (aged 10-11 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

8. Changes in the prevalence of obesity and severe obesity by age, sex, and region of child residence

8.1 Obesity prevalence

For obesity prevalence (Figure 6a, 6b, 6c and 6d):

  • in reception, girls and boys in all regions had lower obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 with prevalence returning close to pre-pandemic rates from 2019 to 2020 but still with some statistically significant difference for some subgroups (figure 6a and 6b)
  • in reception, girls and boys living in the East Midlands and London and boys living in Yorkshire and The Humber had higher obesity prevalence compared to pre-pandemic prevalence of 2019 to 2020 (figure 6a and 6b)
  • in year 6, girls in the North East, East of England and London and boys in every region had lower obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 (figure 6c and 6d)
  • in year 6, obesity prevalence remained higher than pre-pandemic rates of 2019 to 2020 for girls and boys living in every region (figure 6c and 6d)

Girls aged 4 to 5

Figure 6a: Obesity prevalence by region of child residence between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, girls in reception (aged 4-5 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Boys aged 4 to 5

Figure 6b: Obesity prevalence by region of child residence between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, boys in reception (aged 4-5 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Girls aged 10 to 11

Figure 6c: Obesity prevalence by region of child residence between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, girls in year 6 (aged 10-11 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Boys aged 10 to 11

Figure 6d: Obesity prevalence by region of child residence between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, boys in year 6 (aged 10-11 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme ### {- .unlisted}

8.2 Severe obesity prevalence

For severe obesity prevalence (Figure 6e, 6f, 6g and 6h):

  • in reception, girls and boys in all regions had lower severe obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 with prevalence returning close to pre-pandemic rates from 2019 to 2020 but still with some statistically significant difference for some subgroups (figure 6e and 6f)
  • in reception, girls living in Yorkshire and The Humber, West Midlands, East of England and London and boys in every region except the East Midlands had higher severe obesity prevalence compared to pre-pandemic prevalence of 2019 to 2020 (figure 6e and 6f)
  • in year 6, severe obesity prevalence remained higher than pre-pandemic rates of 2019 to 2020 for girls and boys living in every region (figure 6g and 6h)
  • in year 6, boys in Yorkshire and The Humber and London and girls in the West Midlands, East of England and London had lower prevalence of severe obesity in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021, for girls and boys in all other regions, except for girls in the North West, prevalence of severe obesity remained similar in 2021 to 2022 to the high rates seen in 2020 to 2021 (figure 6g and 6h)
  • in year 6, girls living in the North West had higher severe obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021, though severe obesity prevalence remained similar between 2019 to 2020 and 2020 to 2021 for girls in this region (figure 6g)

Girls aged 4 to 5

Figure 6e: Severe obesity prevalence by region of child residence between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, girls in reception (aged 4-5 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Boys aged 4 to 5

Figure 6f: Severe obesity prevalence by region of child residence between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, boys in reception (aged 4-5 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Girls aged 10 to 11

Figure 6g: Severe obesity prevalence by region of child residence between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, girls in year 6 (aged 10-11 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Boys aged 10 to 11

Figure 6h: Severe obesity prevalence by region of child residence between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, boys in year 6 (aged 10-11 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

9. Changes in the prevalence of obesity and severe obesity by age, sex, and rural urban classification

An area where a child lives is classified as either urban or rural based on the type of settlement in which residents in that area typically live. Areas are categorised using the 2011 rural / urban classification. In this report urban/rural classifications are grouped by settlement type: Urban, Town and Fringe, Village and Hamlet and Isolated Dwelling.

9.1 Obesity prevalence

For obesity prevalence (Figure 7a, 7b, 7c, 7d):

  • in reception, girls and boys across all rural and urban areas had lower obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 with prevalence returning close to pre-pandemic rates from 2019 to 2020 but still with some statistically significant difference for some subgroups (figure 7a and 7b)
  • in reception, girls and boys living in urban areas and boys living village areas had higher obesity prevalence compared to pre-pandemic prevalence in 2019 to 2020 (figure 7a and 7b)
  • in reception, girls living in hamlet and isolated dwelling had lower obesity prevalence compared to pre-pandemic prevalence in 2019 to 2020 (figure 7a)
  • in year 6, girls and boys living in urban areas, had lower obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021, and boys in Town and Fringe areas had lower obesity prevalence (figure 7c and 7d)
  • in year 6, obesity prevalence remained higher than pre-pandemic rates of 2019 to 2020 for girls and boys living in each rural and urban classification (figure 7c and 7d)

Girls aged 4 to 5

Figure 5a: Obesity prevalence by rural urban classification between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, girls in reception (aged 4-5 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Boys aged 4 to 5

Figure 5b: Obesity prevalence by rural urban classification between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, boys in reception (aged 4-5 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Girls aged 10 to 11

Figure 5c: Obesity prevalence by rural urban classification between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, girls in year 6 (aged 10-11 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Boys aged 10 to 11

Figure 5d: Obesity prevalence by rural urban classification between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, boys in year 6 (aged 10-11 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

9.2 Severe obesity prevalence

For severe obesity prevalence (Figure 7e, 7f, 7g, 7h):

  • in reception, girls and boys across all rural and urban areas had lower severe obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 with prevalence returning close to pre-pandemic rates from 2019 to 2020 but still with some statistically significant difference for some areas (figure 7e and 7f)
  • in reception, girls and boys living in urban areas and boys living in village areas had higher severe obesity prevalence compared to pre-pandemic prevalence in 2019 to 2020 (figure 7e and 7f)
  • in year 6, girls and boys living in urban areas, had lower severe obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020 to 2021 (figure 7g and 7h)
  • in year 6, severe obesity prevalence remained higher than pre-pandemic rates of 2019 to 2020 for girls and boys living in all areas (figure 7g and 7h)

Girls aged 4 to 5

Figure 5e: Severe obesity prevalence by rural urban classification between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, girls in reception (aged 4-5 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Boys aged 4 to 5

Figure 5f: Severe obesity prevalence by rural urban classification between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, boys in reception (aged 4-5 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Girls aged 10 to 11

Figure 5g: Severe obesity prevalence by rural urban classification between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, girls in year 6 (aged 10-11 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

Boys aged 10 to 11

Figure 5h: Severe obesity prevalence by rural urban classification between 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, boys in year 6 (aged 10-11 years)

Source: National Child Measurement Programme

10. Conclusion

The unprecedented increases in the prevalence of obesity and severe obesity in 2020 to 2021 following the COVID-19 pandemic which led to school closures and other public health measures have for the most part reversed, but for many population groups obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 remains higher than pre-pandemic prevalence, particularly for children in year 6. Prior to 2020 to 2021 prevalence of obesity and severe obesity had seen only small annual changes since the start of the NCMP in 2006 which had not exceeded 1.1 percentage points. Whilst boys and girls in reception had the largest relative increase in prevalence in 2020 to 2021, in 2021 to 2022 they have seen a large relative decrease.

However, it is important to remember that each of the three years of data looked at here are separate cohorts of children and it is not known, for example, whether the cohort measured in reception and year 6 in 2020 to 2021 experienced a decrease in prevalence in 2021 to 2022 as they will have moved into years 2 and 7 so were not measured as part of the NCMP.

In both reception and year 6, boys had a higher prevalence of obesity and severe obesity than girls in all three NCMP years, with the difference between boys and girls in year 6 remaining greater in 2021 to 2022 than experienced pre-pandemic.

The change in obesity prevalence by ethnic group is complex, with no clear patterns and no ethnic group shows consistent change across age and sex groups. However, among many groups, for boys and girls in both school years prevalence remained higher than pre-pandemic levels, though Chinese boys in year 6 had lower obesity prevalence in 2021 to 2022 than the previous two years.

Prior to the pandemic, the largest increases in the prevalence of obesity and severe obesity in boys and girls occurred in the most deprived areas of England among children in year 6. Disparities reported on in previous NCMP publications continue to persist with children living in the most deprived areas continuing to experience prevalence that is at least double that of children living in the least deprived areas.

Generally, urban areas in England with the highest prevalence historically saw the largest increases in obesity and severe obesity prevalence prior to the pandemic, though for children in year 6, obesity and severe obesity prevalence remains higher than pre-pandemic rates regardless of where they live.

11. Methods and further information

11.1 Impact of COVID-19 on data

The 2020 to 2021 and 2019 to 2020 NCMP data collections were both impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic response; the 2019 to 2020 NCMP stopped in March 2020 when schools were required to close and the start of the 2020 to 2021 NCMP was delayed until March 2021.

Local authorities were asked to use the remainder of the academic year, from March to July 2021, to collect a nationally representative sample of data because it was not feasible to expect a full NCMP collection so late into the academic year. Around 300,000 children (25% of previous full measurement years) were measured but the sample was not fully representative of the child population. Therefore, weighting was applied to the analysis to adjust for under or over representation of demographic and socioeconomic groups and make it comparable to previous years of NCMP data. More information about the weighting of data is available in the methodology and data quality chapter of the NHS England NCMP 2020 to 2021 annual report.

At the time the 2019 to 2020 collection stopped, the number of children measured (890,000 children) was around 75% of previous years. Analysis by NHS England and the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID) at the time showed that national level data was reliable and comparable to previous years. Further information is available in the NHS England NCMP 2019 to 2020 annual report.

11.2 Potential bias

There is the potential for error in the collection, collation and interpretation of the NCMP data (bias may be introduced due to poor response rates and selective opt out of children with a high BMI for age and sex which it is not possible to control for).

There is not a good measure of response bias and the degree of selective opt out, but participation rates (the proportion of eligible school children who were measured) may provide a reasonable proxy; the higher the participation rate, the less chance there is for selective opt out, though this is not a perfect method of assessment.

As participation has remained high at 92.3% in 2021 to 2022 then it is unlikely that any bias which may be present would significantly alter the findings of this report.

11.3 Disclosure control

Data analysis for England is not subject to disclosure control. However, sub-national statistics like the regional analysis in section 8 of this report, require the numerators and dominators to be rounded to the nearest five. The prevalence is calculated using these rounded values. Confidence intervals are calculated on the unrounded numerators and dominators. Further information on this method of disclosure control is available from NHS England.

11.4 Determining significant differences

Significance tests have been used in this report to determine whether differences between prevalence estimates are statistically significant.

When the confidence intervals do not overlap the differences are considered as statistically significantly different. However, in some cases, estimates with overlapping confidence intervals will still be statistically significantly different. Where confidence intervals overlap additional significance testing has been applied using the approach applied by NHS England in the annual NCMP report, the method is outlined in Annex F of the NHS Digital report appendices.

11.5 Confidence intervals

A confidence interval is a range of values that is used to quantify the imprecision in the estimate of a particular indicator due to random variation. A wide confidence interval shows that the indicator value presented is likely to be a less precise estimate of the true underlying value.

Confidence intervals were calculated using the Wilson Score method which gives very accurate approximate confidence intervals for proportions and odds based on the assumption of a Binomial distribution. It can be used with any data values, even when the denominator is very small and, unlike some methods, it does not fail to give an interval when the numerator count, and therefore the proportion, is zero. The Wilson Score method is the preferred method for calculating confidence intervals for proportions and odds. The method is described in detail in APHO Technical Briefing 3: Commonly used public health statistics and their confidence intervals.

11.6 Contact information

Responsible statisticians, product lead: Caroline Hancock, Catherine Bray

For queries relating to this document, please contact: PHA-OHID@dhsc.gov.uk