Generated on 2021-10-18

Introduction

Monitoring excess mortality provides understanding of the impact of COVID-19 during the course of the pandemic and beyond. Excess mortality in this report is defined as the number of deaths throughout the pandemic which are above the number expected based on mortality rates in earlier years.

In this report the expected number of deaths is modelled using five years of data from preceding years to estimate the number of deaths we would expect on each week through the pandemic. Excess deaths are estimated by week and in total since 21 March 2020, based on the date each death was registered rather than when it occurred. Excess deaths are presented by age, sex, Upper Tier Local Authority, ethnic group, level of deprivation, cause of death and place of death. Please note, some of the figures in this report have been rounded, though the differences displayed are based on unrounded data.

All Persons

Weekly excess deaths by date of registration, South East.‎

Figure 1: Weekly excess deaths by date of registration, South East.‎

The trend in total excess deaths by week, in South East, since week ending 27 March 2020 is shown in Figure 1. Numbers above each of the columns show the total number of excess deaths and how these compare with the expected number based on modelled estimates for 2015 to 2019. For example, in week ending 24 April 2020 there were 1,548 excess deaths and this was nearly two times (1.87 times higher) the expected number of deaths in this week. When fewer deaths than expected occur in a week, the column is coloured grey.

Excess deaths where COVID-19 was mentioned on the death certificate are shown in orange. If the number of deaths is not shown in the orange part of the column, that means the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected in these weeks.

The number of excess deaths without COVID-19 mentioned on the certificate (shown in the white part of the column) may be due to an increase in deaths from other causes during the period of the pandemic but may also reflect under-reporting of deaths involving COVID-19.

Cumulative deaths since 21 March 2020, by date of registration, South East.

Figure 2: Cumulative deaths since 21 March 2020, by date of registration, South East.

The trend in the total cumulative number of excess deaths in South East since 21 March 2020 is shown in Figure 2.

Age Group Males

Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by age group, males, South East.

Figure 3: Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by age group, males, South East.

Figure 3A for males can be used to compare the cumulative total of excess deaths since 21 March 2020 between age groups.

Figure 3B compares the cumulative total of excess deaths among males with the number which would have been expected based on the modelled estimates for earlier years. Where the ratio of registered to expected is negative, this is shown in grey. The proportion of the excess where COVID-19 was mentioned on the death certificate is shown in yellow.

Table 1 - Males
Age group (years) Registered deaths Expected deaths Ratio registered / expected Excess deaths COVID-19 deaths COVID-19 deaths as % excess
0-24 642 688 -* −46 2 -
25-49 2,792 2,589 1.08 203 222 >100%+
50-64 8,272 6,918 1.20 1,354 1,149 84.9%
65-74 12,629 11,080 1.14 1,549 1,981 >100%+
75-84 21,416 18,978 1.13 2,438 3,891 >100%+
85+ 24,639 22,198 1.11 2,441 4,514 >100%+
Total 70,390 62,451 1.13 7,939 11,759 >100%+

* registered deaths were not significantly different from expected deaths for the time period

+ the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected



Why ratios are important

Ratios can be useful for comparing between groups when the expected number is very different between groups.

For example, if group A had 5 excess deaths and group B had 10, it could appear that the impact was twice as high in group B. However, if the expected number of deaths was 1 in group A and 5 in group B, and the registered numbers of deaths were 6 and 15 respectively, then the ratios would show that group A experienced 6 times the number of deaths compared to expected, while group B experienced 3 times the number expected. Therefore, the actual relative impact is higher in group A.

The ratios presented in this report are relative to historical trends within each group, and not in relation to another group. For example, in the ethnicity section the ratio for the Asian group is the ratio between deaths in this group registered in 2020 and the estimate of expected deaths in the Asian group based on the preceding 5 years. It is not the ratio between the Asian group and another ethnic group.

Age Group Females

Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by age group, females, South East.

Figure 4: Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by age group, females, South East.

Figure 4A for females can be used to compare the cumulative total of excess deaths since 21 March 2020 between age groups.

Figure 4B shows the ratio of the registered to the expected deaths by age group among females since 21 March 2020. This chart can be used to compare the relative excess mortality between age groups.

Table 2 - Females
Age group (years) Registered deaths Expected deaths Ratio registered / expected Excess deaths COVID-19 deaths COVID-19 deaths as % excess
0-24 411 436 -* −25 9 -
25-49 1,753 1,576 1.11 177 147 83.0%
50-64 5,430 4,691 1.16 739 616 83.3%
65-74 8,759 8,024 1.09 735 1,119 >100%+
75-84 17,633 16,397 1.08 1,236 2,654 >100%+
85+ 35,973 32,238 1.12 3,735 5,710 >100%+
Total 69,959 63,362 1.10 6,597 10,255 >100%+

* registered deaths were not significantly different from expected deaths for the time period

+ the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected

Ethnic Group Males

Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by ethnic group, males, South East.

Figure 5: Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by ethnic group, males, South East.

Figure 5A for males can be used to compare the cumulative total of excess deaths since 21 March 2020 between ethnic groups.

Figure 5B shows the ratio of the registered to the expected deaths by ethnic group among males since 21 March 2020. This chart can be used to compare relative excess mortality between ethnic groups.

Table 3 - Males
Ethnic group Registered deaths Expected deaths Ratio registered / expected Excess deaths COVID-19 deaths COVID-19 deaths as % excess
Asian 1,647 1,215 1.36 432 495 >100%*
Black 482 438 -+ 44 115 >100%*
Mixed 282 233 1.21 49 61 >100%*
Other 960 608 1.58 352 221 62.7%
White 66,182 59,192 1.12 6,990 10,821 >100%*

* the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected

+ registered deaths were not significantly different from expected deaths for the time period



Ethnic Group Females

Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by ethnic group, females, South East.

Figure 6: Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by ethnic group, females, South East.

Figure 6A for females can be used to compare the cumulative total of excess deaths since 21 March 2020 between ethnic groups.

Figure 6B shows the ratio of the registered to the expected deaths by ethnic group among females since 21 March 2020. This chart can be used to compare relative excess mortality between ethnic groups.

Table 4 - Females
Ethnic group Registered deaths Expected deaths Ratio registered / expected Excess deaths COVID-19 deaths COVID-19 deaths as % excess
Asian 1,127 1,025 1.10 102 269 >100%*
Black 403 363 -+ 40 73 >100%*
Mixed 236 205 -+ 31 44 >100%*
Other 811 446 1.82 365 135 37.0%
White 66,577 60,556 1.10 6,022 9,711 >100%*

* the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected

+ registered deaths were not significantly different from expected deaths for the time period



Ethnicity coding

Ethnicity is not collected at death registration, so these estimates were made by linking death records to hospital records to find the ethnicity of the deceased. This approach has some limitations. Ethnicity is supposed to be self-reported by the patient in hospital records, but this may not always be the case. Patients may also report different ethnicities in different episodes of care. For this analysis the most recent reported ethnic group was used. Population estimates have been used to calculate mortality rates to estimate the expected numbers of deaths, and these were based on the 2011 Census. This may lead to a mismatch between ethnicity reported in hospital records and self-reported ethnicity in the census. It appears, for example, that more people are assigned to the ‘Other’ group in hospital records than in the 2011 Census.

Deprivation

Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by deprivation quintile, South East.

Figure 7: Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by deprivation quintile, South East.

Figure 7A can be used to compare the cumulative total of excess deaths since 21 March 2020 between deprivation quintiles.

Figure 7B shows the ratio of the registered to the expected deaths by deprivation quintile since 21 March 2020. This chart can be used to compare relative excess mortality between deprivation quintiles.

Table 5
Deprivation quintile Registered deaths Expected deaths Ratio registered / expected Excess deaths COVID-19 deaths COVID-19 deaths as % excess
Quintile 1 - Most Deprived 11,932 11,100 1.07 832 2,025 >100%*
Quintile 2 21,354 19,129 1.12 2,225 3,613 >100%*
Quintile 3 28,722 25,829 1.11 2,893 4,462 >100%*
Quintile 4 34,237 30,480 1.12 3,757 5,256 >100%*
Quintile 5 - Least Deprived 44,104 39,275 1.12 4,829 6,658 >100%*

* the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected

Upper Tier Local Authority

Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by Upper Tier Local Authority, South East.

Figure 8: Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by Upper Tier Local Authority, South East.

Figure 8A can be used to compare the cumulative total of excess deaths since 21 March 2020 between Upper Tier Local Authorities.

Figure 8B shows the ratio of the registered to the expected deaths by Upper Tier Local Authority since 21 March 2020. This chart can be used to compare relative excess mortality between Upper Tier Local Authorities.

Table 6
Upper Tier Local Authority Registered deaths Expected deaths Ratio registered / expected Excess deaths COVID-19 deaths COVID-19 deaths as % excess
Bracknell Forest 1,303 1,135 1.15 168 198 >100%*
Brighton and Hove 3,501 3,189 1.10 312 502 >100%*
Buckinghamshire 7,579 6,739 1.12 840 1,253 >100%*
East Sussex 11,222 10,154 1.11 1,068 1,832 >100%*
Hampshire 21,591 20,007 1.08 1,584 2,974 >100%*
Isle of Wight 3,107 2,755 1.13 352 326 92.5%
Kent 26,349 23,247 1.13 3,102 4,868 >100%*
Medway 4,116 3,491 1.18 625 873 >100%*
Milton Keynes 3,156 2,824 1.12 332 579 >100%*
Oxfordshire 9,245 8,524 1.08 721 1,128 >100%*
Portsmouth 2,873 2,640 1.09 233 437 >100%*
Reading 2,024 1,678 1.21 346 340 98.2%
Slough 1,546 1,262 1.22 284 371 >100%*
Southampton 3,079 2,776 1.11 303 417 >100%*
Surrey 17,888 15,588 1.15 2,300 3,033 >100%*
West Berkshire 2,183 1,886 1.16 297 266 89.6%
West Sussex 15,437 14,144 1.09 1,293 1,920 >100%*
Windsor and Maidenhead 2,134 1,948 1.10 186 367 >100%*
Wokingham 2,016 1,847 1.09 169 330 >100%*

* the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected

Deaths by cause

See ICD10 references for the details of the ICD10 codes for each cause in this section.

Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by cause of death, South East.

Figure 9: Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by cause of death, South East.

Figure 9A shows the total cumulative excess deaths with mention of specific causes anywhere on the death certificate since 21 March 2020. The chart can be used to compare the number of excess deaths for each cause.

This chart can be used to compare the cumulative total of excess deaths since 21 March 2020 between causes.

Figure 9B shows the ratio of the registered to the expected deaths by cause of death since 21 March 2020. This chart can be used to compare relative excess mortality between causes mentioned anywhere on the death certificate.

Table 7
Cause of death mentioned on death certificate Registered deaths Expected deaths Specific cause deaths (underlying cause) COVID-19 deaths (underlying cause) Excess deaths Ratio registered / expected
Ischaemic Heart Diseases 23,169 20,532 11,616 2,518 2,637 1.13
Cerebrovascular Diseases 13,588 12,273 6,853 1,374 1,315 1.11
Other Circulatory Diseases 50,618 44,128 12,570 6,698 6,490 1.15
Heart Failure 16,954 14,765 2,438 1,882 2,189 1.15
Cancer 40,623 40,348 34,636 1,890 275 -*
Acute Respiratory Infections 29,938 24,664 4,602 11,019 5,274 1.21
Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases 16,245 14,474 5,477 3,061 1,771 1.12
Other Respiratory Diseases 10,177 11,102 1,881 1,164 −925 0.92
Dementia and Alzheimer's 27,201 24,537 15,465 4,923 2,664 1.11
Diseases of the Urinary System 18,033 15,449 2,019 2,668 2,584 1.17
Cirrhosis and Other Liver Diseases 4,060 3,563 2,047 258 497 1.14
Diabetes 17,122 12,825 1,561 3,530 4,297 1.34
Parkinson's Disease 3,440 3,130 1,853 557 310 1.10

* registered deaths were not significantly different from expected deaths for the time period

Table 7 shows the number of registered deaths with a cause of death mentioned anywhere on the death certificate, the number expected, the excess deaths and the ratio of registered/expected deaths. It also breaks down the number of registered deaths with that cause registered on the death certificate by the number where the cause was the underlying cause and the number where COVID-19 was the underlying cause.

Place of Death

Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B), by place of death, South East.

Figure 10: Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B), by place of death, South East.

Figure 10A shows the total cumulative excess deaths in each place of death since 21 March 2020. The chart can be used to compare the numbers of excess deaths in each place of death. This chart can be used to compare the cumulative total of excess deaths since 21 March 2020 between places of death.

Figure 10B shows the ratio of the registered to the expected deaths in each place of death since 21 March 2020. This chart can be used to compare relative excess mortality between places of death.

Table 8
Place of death Registered deaths Expected deaths Ratio registered / expected Excess deaths COVID-19 deaths COVID-19 deaths as % excess
Care Home (Nursing or Residential) 35,557 31,611 1.12 3,946 6,441 >100%*
Home 37,833 29,404 1.29 8,429 1,104 13.1%
Hospice 8,536 10,427 0.82 −1,891 453 -
Hospital (Acute or Community, not Psychiatric) 54,590 51,361 1.06 3,229 13,831 >100%*
Other Places 3,833 3,341 1.15 492 185 37.6%

* the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected

Comparisons to other measures of excess deaths in England

The Office for National Statistics also publishes a weekly report on excess deaths in England & Wales. The numbers reported by ONS are broadly in line with the overall excess death figures in this report but there are some differences as the ‘expected’ numbers in this report are not just the simple five-year average for 2015 to 2019, as used by ONS. As explained in the Methods, they are instead modelled estimates which adjust for factors such as the ageing of the population and the underlying trend in mortality rates from year to year.

PHE produces other estimates of excess mortality using the daily General Register Office model and the EuroMOMO model. These are reviewed in this blog.

Updates to Excess Mortality Methodology, December 2020

Several changes to the models were introduced in the regional report from January 2020:

The methodology document has been updated to reflect these changes.

ICD10 references

Cause description ICD10 reference
Ischaemic heart diseases All mentions of I20-I25
Cerebrovascular diseases All mentions of I60-I69
Other circulatory diseases All mentions beginning with I (excluding I20-I25 and I60-I69)
Heart failure All mentions of I11.0, I25.5, I42.0, I42.9, I50.0, I50.1, I50.9
Cancer All mentions of C00-C97
Acute respiratory infections All mentions of J00-J22
Chronic lower respiratory diseases All mentions of J40-J47
Other respiratory diseases All mentions beginning with J (excluding J00-J22 and J40-J47)
Dementia and Alzheimer’s All mentions of F01, F03, or G30
Diseases of the urinary system All mentions of N00-N39
Cirrhosis and other liver diseases All mentions of K70-K76
Diabetes All mentions of E10-E14
Parkinson’s disease All mentions of G20

Back to underlying cause of death section

Download the data

Click to download data as an excel spreadsheet

Click to download data as CSV

Code repository

The code used to create this report is stored here.