Generated on 2021-02-17

Introduction

Monitoring excess mortality provides understanding of the impact of COVID-19 during the course of the pandemic and beyond. Excess mortality in this report is defined as the number of deaths throughout the pandemic which are above the number expected based on mortality rates in earlier years.

In this report the expected number of deaths is modelled using five years of data from preceding years to estimate the number of deaths we would expect on each week through the pandemic. Excess deaths are estimated by week and in total since 21 March 2020, based on the date each death was registered rather than when it occurred. Excess deaths are presented by age, sex, Upper Tier Local Authority, ethnic group, level of deprivation, cause of death and place of death. Please note, some of the figures in this report have been rounded, though the differences displayed are based on unrounded data.

All Persons

Weekly excess deaths by date of registration, East Midlands.‎

Figure 1: Weekly excess deaths by date of registration, East Midlands.‎

The trend in total excess deaths by week, in East Midlands, since week ending 27 March 2020 is shown in Figure 1. Numbers above each of the columns show the total number of excess deaths and how these compare with the expected number based on modelled estimates for 2015 to 2019. For example, in week ending 24 April 2020 there were 725 excess deaths and this was over one and a half times (1.73 times higher) the expected number of deaths in this week. When fewer deaths than expected occur in a week, the column is coloured grey.

Excess deaths where COVID-19 was mentioned on the death certificate are shown in orange. If the number of deaths is not shown in the orange part of the column, that means the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected in these weeks.

The number of excess deaths without COVID-19 mentioned on the certificate (shown in the white part of the column) may be due to an increase in deaths from other causes during the period of the pandemic but may also reflect under-reporting of deaths involving COVID-19.

Cumulative deaths since 21 March 2020, by date of registration, East Midlands.

Figure 2: Cumulative deaths since 21 March 2020, by date of registration, East Midlands.

The trend in the total cumulative number of excess deaths in East Midlands since 21 March 2020 is shown in Figure 2.

Age Group Males

Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by age group, males, East Midlands.

Figure 3: Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by age group, males, East Midlands.

Figure 3A for males can be used to compare the cumulative total of excess deaths since 21 March 2020 between age groups.

Figure 3B compares the cumulative total of excess deaths among males with the number which would have been expected based on the modelled estimates for earlier years. Where the ratio of observed to expected is negative, this is shown in grey. The proportion of the excess where COVID-19 was mentioned on the death certificate is shown in yellow.

Table 1 - Males
Age group (years) Registered deaths Expected deaths Ratio registered / expected Excess deaths COVID-19 deaths COVID-19 deaths as % excess
0-14 116 142 -* −26 1 -
15-44 702 637 -* 65 49 75.9%
45-64 3,357 2,695 1.25 662 527 79.6%
65-74 4,809 3,935 1.22 874 952 >100%+
75-84 7,941 6,451 1.23 1,490 1,799 >100%+
85+ 7,652 6,206 1.23 1,446 1,946 >100%+

* registered deaths were not significantly different from expected deaths for the time period

+ the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected



Why ratios are important

Ratios can be useful for comparing between groups when the expected number is very different between groups.

For example, if group A had 5 excess deaths and group B had 10, it could appear that the impact was twice as high in group B. However, if the expected number of deaths was 1 in group A and 5 in group B, and the registered numbers of deaths were 6 and 15 respectively, then the ratios would show that group A experienced 6 times the number of deaths compared to expected, while group B experienced 3 times the number expected. Therefore, the actual relative impact is higher in group A.

The ratios presented in this report are relative to historical trends within each group, and not in relation to another group. For example, in the ethnicity section the ratio for the Asian group is the ratio between deaths in this group registered in 2020 and the estimate of expected deaths in the Asian group based on the preceding 5 years. It is not the ratio between the Asian group and another ethnic group.

Age Group Females

Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by age group, females, East Midlands.

Figure 4: Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by age group, females, East Midlands.

Figure 4A for females can be used to compare the cumulative total of excess deaths since 21 March 2020 between age groups.

Figure 4B shows the ratio of the observed to the expected deaths by age group among females since 21 March 2020. This chart can be used to compare the relative excess mortality between age groups.

Table 2 - Females
Age group (years) Registered deaths Expected deaths Ratio registered / expected Excess deaths COVID-19 deaths COVID-19 deaths as % excess
0-14 98 112 -* −14 1 -
15-44 377 352 -* 25 34 >100%+
45-64 2,235 1,821 1.23 414 323 78.0%
65-74 3,236 2,755 1.17 481 541 >100%+
75-84 6,325 5,428 1.17 897 1,315 >100%+
85+ 10,950 9,232 1.19 1,718 2,249 >100%+

* registered deaths were not significantly different from expected deaths for the time period

+ the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected

Ethnic Group Males

Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by ethnic group, males, East Midlands.

Figure 5: Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by ethnic group, males, East Midlands.

Figure 5A for males can be used to compare the cumulative total of excess deaths since 21 March 2020 between ethnic groups.

Figure 5B shows the ratio of the observed to the expected deaths by ethnic group among males since 21 March 2020. This chart can be used to compare relative excess mortality between ethnic groups.

Table 3 - Males
Ethnic group Registered deaths Expected deaths Ratio registered / expected Excess deaths COVID-19 deaths COVID-19 deaths as % excess
Asian 895 524 1.71 372 300 80.8%
Black 255 173 1.47 82 74 90.7%
Mixed 110 59 1.88 51 24 45.7%
Other 158 114 1.38 44 42 96.9%
White 22,424 18,685 1.20 3,739 4,537 >100%*

* the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected



Ethnic Group Females

Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by ethnic group, females, East Midlands.

Figure 6: Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by ethnic group, females, East Midlands.

Figure 6A for females can be used to compare the cumulative total of excess deaths since 21 March 2020 between ethnic groups.

Figure 6B shows the ratio of the observed to the expected deaths by ethnic group among females since 21 March 2020. This chart can be used to compare relative excess mortality between ethnic groups.

Table 4 - Females
Ethnic group Registered deaths Expected deaths Ratio registered / expected Excess deaths COVID-19 deaths COVID-19 deaths as % excess
Asian 667 452 1.48 215 186 86.2%
Black 175 136 1.29 39 43 >100%*
Mixed 81 47 1.71 34 20 60.7%
Other 134 77 1.74 57 27 47.5%
White 21,492 18,476 1.16 3,016 3,919 >100%*

* the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected



Ethnicity coding

Ethnicity is not collected at death registration, so these estimates were made by linking death records to hospital records to find the ethnicity of the deceased. This approach has some limitations. Ethnicity is supposed to be self-reported by the patient in hospital records, but this may not always be the case. Patients may also report different ethnicities in different episodes of care. For this analysis the most recent reported ethnic group was used. Population estimates have been used to calculate mortality rates to estimate the expected numbers of deaths, and these were based on the 2011 Census. This may lead to a mismatch between ethnicity reported in hospital records and self-reported ethnicity in the census. It appears, for example, that more people are assigned to the ‘Other’ group in hospital records than in the 2011 Census.

Deprivation

Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by deprivation quintile, East Midlands.

Figure 7: Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by deprivation quintile, East Midlands.

Figure 7A can be used to compare the cumulative total of excess deaths since 21 March 2020 between deprivation quintiles.

Figure 7B shows the ratio of the observed to the expected deaths by deprivation quintile since 21 March 2020. This chart can be used to compare relative excess mortality between deprivation quintiles.

Table 5
Deprivation quintile Registered deaths Expected deaths Ratio registered / expected Excess deaths COVID-19 deaths COVID-19 deaths as % excess
Quintile 1 - Most Deprived 8,844 7,385 1.20 1,459 1,914 >100%*
Quintile 2 9,726 7,947 1.22 1,779 2,085 >100%*
Quintile 3 9,727 7,883 1.23 1,844 1,991 >100%*
Quintile 4 10,208 8,635 1.18 1,573 1,973 >100%*
Quintile 5 - Least Deprived 9,293 7,942 1.17 1,351 1,774 >100%*

* the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected

Upper Tier Local Authority

Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by Upper Tier Local Authority, East Midlands.

Figure 8: Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by Upper Tier Local Authority, East Midlands.

Figure 8A can be used to compare the cumulative total of excess deaths since 21 March 2020 between Upper Tier Local Authorities.

Figure 8B shows the ratio of the observed to the expected deaths by Upper Tier Local Authority since 21 March 2020. This chart can be used to compare relative excess mortality between Upper Tier Local Authorities.

Table 6
Upper Tier Local Authority Registered deaths Expected deaths Ratio registered / expected Excess deaths COVID-19 deaths COVID-19 deaths as % excess
Derby 2,477 2,029 1.22 448 655 >100%*
Derbyshire 8,622 7,293 1.18 1,329 1,825 >100%*
Leicester 2,930 2,179 1.34 751 702 93.5%
Leicestershire 6,679 5,486 1.22 1,193 1,278 >100%*
Lincolnshire 8,827 7,417 1.19 1,410 1,473 >100%*
Northamptonshire 6,712 5,709 1.18 1,003 1,403 >100%*
Nottingham 2,484 1,990 1.25 494 585 >100%*
Nottinghamshire 8,675 7,320 1.19 1,355 1,761 >100%*
Rutland 392 342 -+ 50 55 >100%*

* the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected

+ registered deaths were not significantly different from expected deaths for the time period

Deaths by underlying cause

See ICD10 references for the details of the ICD10 codes for each cause in this section.

Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by underlying cause of death, East Midlands.

Figure 9: Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B) by underlying cause of death, East Midlands.

Figure 9A shows the total cumulative excess deaths by UCOD since 21 March 2020. The chart can be used to compare the number of excess deaths for each UCOD.

This chart can be used to compare the cumulative total of excess deaths since 21 March 2020 between underlying causes.

Figure 9B shows the ratio of the observed to the expected deaths by UCOD since 21 March 2020. This chart can be used to compare relative excess mortality between underlying causes of death.

Table 7
Underlying cause of death Registered deaths Expected deaths Ratio registered / expected Excess deaths COVID-19 deaths COVID-19 deaths as % excess
Ischaemic Heart Diseases 4,360 3,914 1.11 446 128 28.7%
Cerebrovascular Diseases 2,123 1,971 1.08 152 92 60.4%
Other Circulatory Diseases 3,524 3,457 -* 67 109 >100%+
Cancer 11,064 11,206 -* −142 267 -
Acute Respiratory Infections 1,405 1,971 0.71 −566 0 -
Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases 1,892 2,355 0.80 −463 33 -
Other Respiratory Diseases 611 832 0.73 −221 26 -
Dementia and Alzheimer's 5,184 5,323 -* −139 194 -
Diseases of the Urinary System 550 584 -* −34 18 -
Cirrhosis and Other Liver Diseases 675 631 -* 44 15 34.4%
Parkinson's Disease 556 590 -* −34 17 -
All Other Causes (Excl. COVID-19) 7,188 7,047 -* 141 172 >100%+

* registered deaths were not significantly different from expected deaths for the time period

+ the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected

Place of Death

Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B), by place of death, East Midlands.

Figure 10: Cumulative excess deaths (A) and the ratio of registered deaths to expected deaths (B), by place of death, East Midlands.

Figure 10A shows the total cumulative excess deaths in each place of death since 21 March 2020. The chart can be used to compare the numbers of excess deaths in each place of death. This chart can be used to compare the cumulative total of excess deaths since 21 March 2020 between places of death.

Figure 10B shows the ratio of the observed to the expected deaths in each place of death since 21 March 2020. This chart can be used to compare relative excess mortality between places of death.

Table 8
Place of death Registered deaths Expected deaths Ratio registered / expected Excess deaths COVID-19 deaths COVID-19 deaths as % excess
Care Home (Nursing or Residential) 11,468 9,093 1.26 2,375 2,509 >100%*
Home 13,292 9,883 1.34 3,409 437 12.8%
Hospice 1,621 1,910 0.85 −289 208 -
Hospital (Acute or Community, not Psychiatric) 20,317 17,871 1.14 2,446 6,504 >100%*
Other Places 1,100 1,006 -+ 94 79 84.3%

* the total excess was less than the number of deaths with a mention of COVID-19, indicating fewer deaths from other causes than expected

+ registered deaths were not significantly different from expected deaths for the time period

Comparisons to other measures of excess deaths in England

The Office for National Statistics also publishes a weekly report on excess deaths in England & Wales. The numbers reported by ONS are broadly in line with the overall excess death figures in this report but there are some differences as the ‘expected’ numbers in this report are not just the simple five-year average for 2015 to 2019, as used by ONS. As explained in the Methods, they are instead modelled estimates which adjust for factors such as the ageing of the population and the underlying trend in mortality rates from year to year.

EuroMOMO is a European mortality monitoring programme that aims to measure excess deaths related to seasonal influenza and other public health threats that uses a standardised methodology across 24 European countries. The methodology used by EuroMOMO is similar to that used by the PHE model, however, the EuroMOMO model looks at deaths by date of occurrence, and the PHE model looks at deaths by date of registration. Because there is a time lag between date of occurrence of death and date of registration, analysis of excess deaths by date of occurrence requires a delay correction, the reliability of which improves over time. These two models produce very similar results but with small differences due to the delay correction applied by EuroMOMO.

The PHE Daily GRO mortality model is used in PHE’s COVID-19 surveillance report for all-cause mortality. It uses a 5-year average to estimate expected deaths, similar to that used by the ONS but with a trend included. It looks at deaths by date of occurrence based on rapidly reported deaths from the General Register Office and uses a registration delay correction, the reliability of which improves over time. Overall, the excess deaths are similar in the COVID-19 surveillance report and this report, but may show some differences in specific weeks due to use of occurrence date compared with registration date, and in recent weeks due to the delay corrections.

Updates to Excess Mortality Methodology, December 2020

Several changes to the models were introduced in the regional report from January 2020:

The methodology document has been updated to reflect these changes.

ICD10 references

Cause description ICD10 reference
Ischaemic heart diseases Underlying cause of death is between I20-I25
Cerebrovascular diseases Underlying cause of death is between I60-I69
Other circulatory diseases Underlying cause of death begins with I (excluding I20-I25 and I60-I69)
Cancer Underlying cause of death is between C00-C97
Acute respiratory infections Underlying cause of death is between J00-J22
Chronic lower respiratory diseases Underlying cause of death is between J40-J47
Other respiratory diseases Underlying cause of death begins with J (excluding J00-J22 and J40-J47)
Dementia and Alzheimer’s Underlying cause of death is one of F01, F03, or G30
Diseases of the urinary system Underlying cause of death is between N00-N39
Cirrhosis and other liver diseases Underlying cause of death is between K70-K76
Parkinson’s disease Underlying cause of death is G20
All other causes (excl. COVID-19) All other underlying causes of death (excluding COVID-19)

Back to underlying cause of death section

Download the data

Click to download

Code repository

The code used to create this report is stored here.